AI governance is becoming a security requirement, not a policy document

For a while, 'AI governance' mostly meant a policy document sitting in a shared drive. That's changing quickly as frameworks mature and regulators start asking for evidence: testing records, monitoring logs, documented remediation.

That's a security problem before it's a legal one. You can't produce evidence of testing you didn't do, and you can't document monitoring you never set up.

This post looks at what 'evidence-ready' AI governance actually requires operationally, and where it overlaps almost entirely with good AI security practice.